Tzaddikim Discussion Forums
Tzaddikim

Go Back   Tzaddikim Discussion Forums > General Theology Forums > Open Theology Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2011, 09:00 PM
newnature newnature is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
A Study of Morality

At that fateful moment, Adam and Eve are standing together at the tree, and although only the woman and the serpent speak, Adam was present, and it seems he accepted the fruit that his wife handed him. He was fully complicitous, and indeed, Yahweh holds him responsible. Yahweh reproaches Adam. Adam says: Well, Eve handed to me. She gave it to me. Eve explains, the serpent tricked me. Yahweh vents his fury on all three, and he does so in ascending order: first the serpent for his trickery and then the woman, and finally the man. The doctrine of original sin, which is the idea that humans after Adam are born into a state of sin, by definition. The actions of Adam and Eve bring death to the human race, they don’t bring a state of utter and unredeemed sinfulness. In fact, humans have moral choice in each and every age. Adam and Eve after eating the fruit of the knowledge of good and bad, they also lose their harmonious relationship with nature. There had been a peaceful relationship between creatures and humans to that point. Humans are banished now from the Garden. It used to yield its fruits to them without any labor, but now humans have to toil for food and the earth yields its fruits only stintingly. The humans will learn that the concomitant of their freedom is responsibility. Their first act of defiance is punished harshly. So they learn, that the moral choices and actions of humans have consequences that have to be borne by the perpetrator. Evil is a product of human behavior, not a principal inherent in the cosmos; man’s disobedience is the cause of the human predicament. So knowledge or wisdom or perhaps moral freedom, seems to come at a very high price.

The disobedience happens in a rather backhanded way. It’s interesting, Yahweh tells Adam before the creation of Eve that he’s not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and bad, lest you die. Eve doesn’t hear this command directly, she hasn’t been created. Then we meet the cunning serpent, and although many will identify the serpent as Satan, an enticer, a tempter, some sort of evil creature, the serpent doesn’t seem to be so. The serpent in Eden is simply a talking animal.

Adam and Eve after eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and bad are like Yahweh; they have become wise in that they have learned they have moral choice. They have free will, they can defy Yahweh and Yahweh’s plans for them in a way that animals and natural phenomena cannot. But now that means there is a serious danger here, Yahweh says, “Now that the man has become like one of us, knowing good and bad, what if he should stretch out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and life forever!” So the acceptance of mortality as an inescapable part of the human condition, the quest for immortality, Yahweh could not afford to allow them access to the tree of life, and Yahweh maintains the upper hand in this, the fact that they eventually must die. Yahweh has to punt the ball, he has to modify his plans by barring access to the tree of life, humans are going to be a force to be reckoned with. Because of the length of these reasoning’s, read more at,

http://thatlifeyahwehhas.blogspot.co...max-results=12

Thanks for any insight.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-30-2012, 10:15 AM
hollysurly hollysurly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scranton
Posts: 2
Good or bad intentions
For their experiment, the scientists had 20 capacity apprehend several dozen altered belief about humans with adequate or bad intentions that resulted in a array of outcomes.

One archetypal adventure was about a admirer who leads his adherent beyond a bridge. In some versions, the admirer harmlessly absolved his adherent beyond the arch with no ill effect. In added cases, the admirer carefully led the adherent forth so she would breach her ankle.

The capacity acclimated a seven point calibration - one getting banned and seven absolutely permissible - to almanac whether they through the bearings was about adequate or not.

While the capacity apprehend the story, the scientists activated a alluring acreage application a adjustment accepted as transcranial alluring stimulation. The alluring fields created abashing in the neurons that accomplish up the RTPJ, says Young, causing them to blaze off electrical pulses chaotically.

The abashing in the academician fabricated it harder for capacity to adapt the boyfriend's intent, says Young, and instead fabricated the capacity focus alone on the situation's outcome. The aftereffect was acting and safe.

When no alluring acreage was applied, the capacity focused added on the boyfriend's adequate intentions, rather than a bad outcome. When a alluring acreage was activated to the RTPJ, the capacity consistently focused on a bad outcome, rather than the intention, and rated the adventure as added about objectionable.

The scientists didn't assuredly abolish the subject's moral sensibilities. On the scientists' seven point scale, the aberration was about one point and averaged out to about a 15% change.

It's not much, says Young, "but it's still arresting to see such a change in such top akin behaviour as moral decision-making."

Young aswell credibility out that the abstraction was correlation; their plan alone links the RTJP, chastity and alluring fields, but doesn't definitively prove that one causes another.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Space Provided By: 1&1